Why it matters:
The communication highlights the complexities of U.S.-Iran relations and the continued use of third-party channels for diplomacy, especially amid heightened tensions and military threats.
The big picture:
As both nations navigate their fraught relationship, using Oman as an intermediary underscores the importance of maintaining dialogue, even in the absence of direct negotiations.
What he's saying:
Araghchi stated, "The official response from Iran to Mr. Trump's letter was sent appropriately through Oman." He elaborated that the response includes Iran's viewpoints regarding the current situation and Trump's letter.
Araghchi emphasized that Iran's policy remains one of not engaging in direct negotiations under conditions of maximum pressure and military threats, but indirect negotiations can continue, as seen in the past.
He noted that both the previous administration under President Rouhani and President Raisi have engaged in indirect negotiations.
Key points:
Trump's letter, which he announced during a Fox Business interview, expressed Washington's willingness to negotiate with Iran and seek an agreement different from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
Go deeper:
The exchange between Iran and the U.S., facilitated by Oman, reflects the ongoing challenges in diplomatic relations and the potential for future negotiations.
Negotiations With U.S., Why Not?!
Iran’s UN Mission: No Negotiations on Dismantling Nuclear Program
محمود مجدی
