Why it matters:
The debate highlights the ongoing tensions between Iran and the U.S. regarding Iran's nuclear rights and the future of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). The exchange underscores the deep divisions over nuclear non-proliferation and the continued diplomatic stalemate between the two countries.
The big picture:
As the U.S. pushes for a stricter stance on Iran’s nuclear activities, particularly its uranium enrichment, Iran asserts its rights under international law, particularly the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). This clash, set against the backdrop of ongoing international discussions on Iran’s nuclear program, reflects the broader geopolitical conflict that could influence future negotiations or lead to further escalation.
What they're saying:
Iran’s Ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, sharply criticized the U.S. representative’s remarks, reaffirming Iran's right to peaceful nuclear development. Iravani insisted that U.S. pressure for a "zero enrichment" policy is incompatible with Iran's legal rights under the NPT and is an attempt to impose external political demands.
The U.S. representative, Ms. Ortega, claimed that Iran has no right to enrich uranium on its own soil and stated that the U.S. seeks direct negotiations with Iran.
Go deeper:
UN Deputy Acknowledges Security Council Division Over 'Snapback' Sanctions on Iran
M.Majdi - Hossein Vaez
