Why it matters:
Aid workers are protected under international humanitarian law, and attacks on them can trigger domestic and international accountability.
Damage to ambulances and relief facilities weakens emergency response capacity during crises.
The big picture:
The Red Crescent — typically a neutral, apolitical humanitarian body — seldom comments on security-related events. Its decision to issue a formal condemnation suggests the severity of the attacks during the recent unrest.
Internationally, targeting medical personnel and emergency infrastructure is considered a serious breach of humanitarian law and can carry legal consequences for perpetrators and their supporters.
Key points:
- The Red Crescent condemned attacks on aid workers and ambulances, stressing that its personnel have no political or security role.
- The statement described assaults on aid workers as an attack on the right to life, and warned that destroying relief supplies threatens public health and national resilience.
- The organization emphasized the operational and humanitarian immunity of aid workers, ambulances, and medical facilities under Red Cross/Red Crescent principles and international humanitarian law.
- These actions were described as clear violations of international humanitarian and human rights law, creating legal responsibility for those who support such behavior.
Go deeper:
Health Official: Volunteer Response by Physicians Key Strength in Crisis Care
Neda Sajjadi - A.Akbari
