The U.S. direct military strikes across Venezuela, including the kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro, have triggered strong reactions across social media worldwide.

Why it Matters:

The operation drew sharp condemnation for violating international law. Protests have erupted both in Venezuela and in front of the White House, with hashtags like #LawOfTheJungle trending as users expressed outrage over what they describe as blatant violation of international law.

 

The Big Picture:

Social media is facing a growing global debate over the legitimacy of U.S. military interventions. People’s reactions on social media shows widespread anger at the violation of sovereignty, the kidnapping of a sitting president, and the apparent disregard for international law. The actions is prompting both street-level protests and online backlash, reflecting a deep mistrust of unilateral military actions. Across platforms, phrases like “Trump is a war criminal” and "Hands Off Venezuela" have surged in popularity, reflecting broad disapproval of U.S. tactics.

 

 

What they’re saying:

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer called Maduro illegitimate, saying Britain “will not shed a tear over the end of Maduro’s rule.” Social media users quickly pushed back, citing data suggesting Maduro’s popularity in Venezuela exceeds Starmer’s in the U.K. Others mocked the Prime Minister for claiming support for international law while ignoring what many see as illegal U.S. actions. A user commented meanwhile: “How can you support bombing a sovereign country, kidnapping its president, and carrying out regime change while claiming to support international law?”

In Argentina, President Javier Milei publicly endorsed the U.S. operation. This statement sparked widespread criticism online, with users highlighting domestic grievances over his far-right policies and rising inflation.

 

 

Go Deeper:


U.S. Attack on Venezuela Draws Condemnation From Iran

Sara Archin 

 

 

F.abedi - Mahboubeh Habibi