Why it matters:
Jolani’s shift from terrorism to governance represents a broader evolution in Syria’s conflict dynamics. His leadership of a large population raises questions about political legitimacy, stability, and long-term peace efforts.
The big picture:
Once feared as a militant leader, Jolani now manages the governance of northwest Syria, adapting his approach to administration rather than armed conflict. His transformation mirrors other global cases where former militant figures transition into political roles amid prolonged unrest.
What he's saying:
The American diplomat, Robert Ford, former American diplomat stated that Jolani had admitted that the strategies he employed in Iraq were not applicable when governing a population of four million. He has not issued apologies for past terrorist acts but has acknowledged the challenges of administration.
Key points:
- Jolani’s real identity as Ahmad Sharaa was revealed after he captured Damascus in December 2024.
- A British NGO facilitated discussions aimed at integrating Jolani into political governance.
- The diplomat described the conversation as unexpectedly civil despite initial apprehensions.
- Jolani’s leadership in northwest Syria signifies a shift from militant operations to political administration.
Go deeper:
Ford's account sheds light on ongoing efforts to stabilize opposition-controlled regions in Syria, where former militant leaders are increasingly taking on governance roles. Experts remain divided on whether figures like Jolani can be fully rehabilitated into legitimate political positions, sparking debate on the broader implications of such transitions. As Syria’s conflict continues to reshape alliances, the international community faces difficult decisions about whether to engage with opposition leaders who have militant pasts, weighing the risks of legitimizing their authority against the potential for long-term stability.
Hossein Amiri
