Why it matters:
Roberts’ remarks feed into broader debates about the shifting balance of military power in West Asia, the effectiveness of the Israeli regime’s defensive systems, and Washington’s long-standing alignment with Tel Aviv.
His comments also reflect intensifying criticism from U.S. political outsiders who argue that American foreign policy is driven more by Israeli strategic interests than by U.S. national priorities.
The big picture:
Roberts, a prominent critic of U.S. interventionism, framed Iran’s limited strikes as proof that the Israeli regime’s defense systems are outdated and overestimated. He claimed the Israeli regime sought a ceasefire through Washington because it had “lost military advantage” and needed time to recover.
He also argued that U.S. policy in the region—spanning Libya, Iraq, Syria, Iran, and beyond—is heavily influenced by Israeli lobbying groups, which he described as the most powerful political forces in Washington.
Expanding his critique, Roberts also discussed Russia’s restraint in Ukraine, U.S. domestic polarization, banking-sector consolidation, and concerns over a federal digital currency potentially leading to authoritarian control.
What he is saying:
Roberts said Iran’s strikes demonstrated that it can disable Israel’s defenses, adding that “continued attacks could have meant damage or even Israel’s destruction.”
He argued that Israel’s request for a ceasefire through the U.S. signaled a loss of tactical control.
He accused multiple U.S. administrations, including Trump’s, of allowing Israeli interests to dominate U.S. foreign policy.
Domestically, Roberts described the U.S. political system as "broken," pointing to open borders, government shutdowns, and extreme partisan gridlock.
Key points:
• Roberts says Israel’s Iron Dome proved “old and ineffective,” giving Iran significant leverage during the war.
• He claims Israel’s influence over U.S. politics drives Washington to remove governments opposed to Tel Aviv across the region.
• He warns that a shift toward a U.S. digital currency could give the government unprecedented control over private assets.
• He portrays the U.S. political system as dysfunctional, with deep polarization, weakened democratic processes, and rising social tensions.
• He concludes that U.S. foreign policy creates instability in West Asia, Eastern Europe, and Latin America.
Go deeper:
Western Media Report: Iran Hit Secret Israeli Military Command Center During War
M.Majdi - ahmad shirzadian
