Why it matters:
This claim highlights the complex geopolitical dynamics in South Asia, particularly the role of external actors in regional conflicts. It raises questions about the influence of foreign powers in the ongoing India-Pakistan rivalry.
The big picture:
Hayat's comments come in the context of heightened military tensions between India and Pakistan, including a recent four-day conflict. His assertion points to a broader narrative of foreign involvement in regional disputes, which could impact diplomatic relations and security strategies.
What he's saying:
- During a television interview, Hayat stated, “I think that India did not dare to do this; rather, Israel was behind this incident. The whole world saw that the drones and weapons used in these attacks were Israeli.”
- He emphasized that Pakistan's armed forces responded decisively to ensure national security, leading to India's retreat from its aggressive stance.
- Hayat highlighted the celebrations in Pakistan known as "Youm-e-Tashakkur," stating, “The people of Pakistan feel victorious and proud once again after years, and they commemorate this day with gratitude to God.”
- He claimed that the ceasefire between Pakistan and India was a result of the superiority of Pakistani forces and India's subsequent request for mediation from the U.S.
- Hayat asserted that Pakistan targeted only those facilities directly used against it, denying any attacks on civilian areas.
Go deeper:
The involvement of foreign intelligence agencies, such as Mossad, in supporting India's missile attacks against Pakistan has prompted analysts, including prominent Pakistani journalist Hamid Mir, to warn the government about the implications of these developments. Experts argue that the role of Israel in recent tensions should not be overlooked, urging Islamabad to recalibrate its regional policies with greater caution.
محمود مجدی
