Why it matters:
The decision underscores growing international controversy surrounding Machado’s award, with critics questioning her commitment to peace and nonviolence. It also highlights a rift between Norway’s grassroots peace movement and the Nobel Committee.
The big picture:
The controversy reflects broader tensions over the politicization of international awards and the evolving definition of “peace” in a polarized world. It also raises questions about the Nobel Committee’s criteria and the role of Western institutions in shaping global narratives.
Zoom in:
The Norwegian Peace Council, an umbrella group representing 17 pacifist organizations and 15,000 activists, said Machado’s selection “does not align with the fundamental values” of the peace movement.
The Council traditionally organizes a torchlight procession through Oslo on Nobel Day, a symbolic event that has now been canceled.
What they’re saying:
Council President Eline H. Lorentzen stated: “We must remain true to our principles… Some of the methods [of the Nobel Committee] are not in line with our values, such as promoting dialogue and non-violence.”
The Council emphasized its respect for the Nobel institution but stressed its independence and commitment to peaceful conflict resolution.
Nobel Peace Prize laureate Adolfo Pérez Esquivel (1980) criticized the decision, saying Machado “always asked the U.S. to intervene with troops in Venezuela.”
Spanish political scientist Juan Carlos Monedero called for renaming the prize to avoid “tarnishing the memory of Alfred Nobel.”
The Nobel Committee has not publicly responded to the backlash but maintains that its decisions are based on independent deliberation.
Between the lines:
Machado, a prominent Venezuelan opposition leader, has long been a polarizing figure. Critics criticize her for supporting foreign intervention and undermining democratic processes in Venezuela. Supporters, however, view her as a symbol of resistance against what they call "authoritarianism."
What’s next:
While the Nobel ceremony will proceed in Oslo, the absence of the Peace Council’s torchlight procession will be a visible sign of dissent. Observers expect continued debate over Machado’s legacy and the future direction of the Peace Prize.
Go deeper:
Nobel Peace Prize Winner Appreciates Netanyahu for War On Gaza
Hossein Amiri - A.Akbari