Why it matters:
The imposition of new sanctions while nuclear talks are ongoing signals a growing gap between American rhetoric and action. For Iran, this not only complicates diplomacy but deepens mistrust, casting doubt on the future of any deal.
The big picture:
Tensions between Tehran and Washington remain high as both sides navigate the fragile terrain of nuclear diplomacy. Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful and transparent, while the U.S. continues to impose sanctions, moves Tehran sees as hostile and self-defeating. The dual-track approach of sanctions and dialogue has long defined the post-JCPOA era, but now risks total collapse.
What he's saying:
“We used the word ‘difficult’ for a reason,” Baghaei said, adding that “The U.S. has shown it does not adhere to conventional diplomatic norms. Imposing sanctions while claiming to pursue diplomacy proves a lack of seriousness and goodwill.”
He added that each new sanctions package increases the burden on U.S. policymakers.
“These sanctions constitute crimes against humanity and blatant violations of the human rights of every Iranian.”
“Our choice of diplomacy is rooted in confidence, we have nothing to hide. The Islamic Republic’s nuclear program has always been peaceful.”
Key points:
- Sanctions during talks expose a fundamental inconsistency in the U.S. approach.
- Iran sees continued sanctions as proof that the U.S. is not serious about diplomacy.
- Iranian officials frame the sanctions as collective punishment, violating international norms.
- Iran asserts its nuclear program is fully peaceful and open to scrutiny.
Go deeper:
Since the U.S. exit from the 2015 nuclear deal, Tehran has repeatedly expressed frustration with what it sees as Western double standards, negotiating while applying economic pressure behind the scenes.
President Pezeshkian: We Negotiate, But We Do Not Fear Threats
Hossein Vaez
