Why it matters:
The allegations highlight growing global concern over the U.S.’s expanding use of lethal force outside traditional conflict zones, raising questions about accountability, civilian safety, and adherence to international law.
The big picture:
Since early September, more than 60 people have been killed in U.S. air strikes against vessels suspected of drug trafficking or terrorism. Washington has defended the strikes as part of what it calls counterterrorism and anti-narcotics efforts, but the UN says those justifications fall under law enforcement, not wartime standards, where lethal force is highly restricted.
What she's saying:
Ravina Shamdasani, spokesperson for the UN human rights office, said in Geneva that these attacks and the rising number of civilian deaths are unacceptable. She called on the U.S. to immediately stop the strikes and take all necessary steps to prevent unlawful killings, regardless of the allegations against those targeted.
Key points:
- UN says the U.S. strikes lack any legal justification under international law.
- The High Commissioner demands an independent, transparent investigation.
- The UN urges the U.S. to use standard law enforcement tactics, such as interception and arrest, instead of lethal attacks.
Go deeper:
U.S. Forces Moving Toward Venezuela as Trump Rejects Attack Plans
M.Majdi - seyed mohammad kazemi
