Why it matters:
Petro’s remarks come amid growing diplomatic rumors and intelligence reports suggesting Washington may be considering military action in response to the crisis in Venezuela and alleged border instability. His warning challenges U.S. strategic assumptions and signals a unified regional stance against foreign intervention.
The big picture:
Petro emphasized that Latin America would respond collectively to any aggression against Venezuela.
He recalled the history of foreign interventions in the region, which he said have only led to violence and suffering.
The Colombian leader stressed that regional issues must be resolved through diplomacy and dialogue—not external force.
His comments reflect broader concerns over U.S. militarism and its long-standing interest in Venezuela’s vast oil reserves, often masked by narratives around drug trafficking and border security.
What they’re saying:
“With all due respect to the United States, we say: don’t even try it,” Petro said.
He warned that any ground operation in Venezuela or Colombia would trigger a unified regional response.
The Maduro government in Caracas quickly praised Petro’s stance, calling it courageous and affirming a shared commitment to defending regional sovereignty.
Between the lines:
While Washington continues to frame its Latin American posture around counter-narcotics and security concerns, critics argue these are pretexts for deeper geopolitical ambitions. Petro’s warning underscores growing resistance to U.S. interventionism and a push for Latin American autonomy in resolving its own crises.
What’s next:
Petro’s statement may galvanize other regional leaders to adopt firmer positions against U.S. military involvement. As tensions rise, diplomatic channels will be crucial to preventing escalation and preserving regional stability.
Go deeper:
Colombia’s Petro Defies U.S. Sanctions, Calls Them Attack on National Sovereignty
Hossein Amiri
