Why it matters:
Since Iran has emphasized its compliance with nuclear commitments in the JCPOA and cooperation with the IAEA, activating the "Snapback Mechanism" by E3 (Germany, France, and the U.K.) can affect the results of the diplomatic path chosen by the Islamic Republic of Iran.
What is Snapback?
Under the 2015 deal, there is a process known as "snapback" that would reimpose U.N. sanctions on Iran.
If the parties cannot resolve accusations of "significant non-performance" by Iran, this process can be triggered at the 15-member United Nations Security Council.
Once initiated, the Security Council must vote within 30 days on a resolution to continue Iran's sanctions relief, requiring nine votes in favor and no vetoes by the United States, Russia, China, Britain, or France to pass.
The big picture:
The snapback mechanism, embedded in the JCPOA, allows UN sanctions to be reinstated if Iran is deemed non-compliant by the other parties. Tehran argues that it only scaled back its commitments after being denied the deal’s economic benefits due to U.S. sanctions. Iran has repeatedly warned that increased Western pressure will be met with escalatory measures.
What he's saying:
Najafi emphasized that Iran's nuclear activities, including enrichment and storage, are peaceful and within its rights under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
He stated, "Iran, as a committed member of the NPT, will not seek nuclear weapons."
He also criticized the European Troika for violating the JCPOA and UN Security Council Resolution 2231, asserting that they lack the moral standing to activate the dispute resolution mechanism.
Key points:
- Iran has the right to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, including enrichment.
- Iran is committed to its nuclear obligations post-JCPOA and its cooperation with the IAEA.
- Any actions against Resolution 2231 or new sanctions would have serious consequences.
Go deeper:
Iran Warns E3 Against Abuse of 'Snapback'
Zohre Khazaee
