Iran Press/ West Asia: This vision resonates with a long-standing ideology that sees the region through a lens of territorial expansion and ethnic exclusivity, reminiscent of historical conflicts that have plagued the area for decades.
Smotrich's comments can be interpreted as a manifestation of the “zero-sum game” mentality that has characterized Israeli-Arab relations since the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948. This approach inherently views the empowerment of Arab nations and peoples as a direct threat to Israeli security and existence. Historically, such perspectives have led to military confrontations, as seen in the wars of 1956, 1967, and 1973. The notion that expanding Israeli sovereignty over Palestinian territories would somehow lead to stability is not only misguided but also dangerously provocative.
The implications of Smotrich’s statements extend beyond mere rhetoric; they threaten to exacerbate existing tensions within Palestinian communities and among neighboring Arab states. The idea of annexing Palestinian territories under the guise of establishing a greater Jewish state disregards the rights and aspirations of millions of Palestinians who have long sought self-determination. This could lead to increased resistance, from Palestinians who feel their existence is being further marginalized.
Moreover, such declarations could ignite regional tensions. The historical context shows that any perceived encroachment on Arab territories stirs nationalist sentiments across the Arab world.
The potential for renewed conflict is significant; this rhetoric could galvanize not only Palestinian factions but also other regional players who view these actions as existential threats. Iran's support for groups like Hezbollah and Hamas could intensify if they perceive an opportunity to position themselves as defenders of Palestinian rights against Israeli aggression.
Experts often emphasize how power dynamics shape narratives in international relations. In this case, Smotrich’s comments reflect an entrenched power structure that seeks to maintain dominance through territorial expansion while dismissing international law and human rights considerations. The alignment of Netanyahu's coalition government with such views shows the depth of influence of such views in the official policy of the Israeli regime.
The call for a greater Jewish state also poses significant risks to Israel itself. By adopting an aggressive stance toward territorial claims, Israel may find itself increasingly isolated on the international stage. The backlash from global communities condemning expansionist policies could lead to economic sanctions or diplomatic isolation, similar to what South Africa faced during its apartheid era.
Finally, Bezalel Smotrich's advocacy for a Jewish state encompassing all Palestinian territories represents not only a dangerous escalation in Israeli rhetoric but also a potential catalyst for renewed conflict in the Middle East.
As history has shown, such ideologies often lead to cycles of violence that undermine peace efforts and exacerbate human suffering. The international community must remain vigilant and proactive in addressing these issues to prevent further destabilization in an already fragile region.
"However, if we want to make a realistic judgment, these statements by Smurtich do not express a mere wish, but rather an intention that all the leaders of the Zionist regime contemplate but may not openly express."
303
