Why it matters:
Netanyahu’s threat to strike Iranian nuclear sites and his hardline stance risks fracturing U.S.-Israel coordination and escalating tensions in West Asia just as American negotiators seek a peaceful resolution.
The big picture:
Washington and Tel Aviv remain divided over how to approach Iran’s nuclear Deal. While Trump’s team are exploring a framework to reduce tensions, Netanyahu is pushing for a more aggressive, militarized path.
The rift highlights broader geopolitical divergences between the two allies as the region teeters on the edge of another potential conflict.
What they'er saying:
In the reported call, Netanyahu told Trump that "now is the right time for military action," suggesting that diplomacy is futile. Trump, however, disagreed, arguing this is a “perfect opportunity for negotiation,” underscoring a long-standing divide between the two leaders over how to deal with Iran.
Key points:
- Netanyahu threatened to sabotage nuclear negotiations with a strike on Iran’s key facilities, U.S. officials told The New York Times.
- The call with Trump reportedly turned heated as both leaders clashed over their visions for Iran.
- American negotiators, including Steve Wietkoff, are exploring new options with Omani mediators, including a regional nuclear energy initiative.
- Wietkoff has softened his previous opposition to a temporary deal that could lay the groundwork for a comprehensive agreement.
- Reports indicate Israel and U.S. hardliners may resist Wietkoff’s diplomatic overtures, though they could open the door to further talks.
- Washington remains committed to finding common ground with Iran and reducing nuclear-related tensions.
Go deeper:
Iran Appreciates Oman For Managing Indirect Talks With U.S.
Hossein Vaez