Why it matters:
Washington’s illegal abduction of Venezuela’s legitimate president and his wife sets a dangerous precedent in international law.
Analysts warn that it threatens peace and security across Latin America, undermining global norms of sovereignty.
Driving the news:
The kidnapping, described by Venezuelan officials as state terrorism and a blatant violation of the UN Charter, has shaken the nation.
Following confirmation, Executive Vice President Delcy Rodríguez was sworn in as interim president and assumed command of the armed forces.
Under Article 233 of the Venezuelan Constitution, Maduro’s forced removal constitutes “absolute absence,” requiring elections within 30 days.
The big picture:
The U.S. has long sought influence over Venezuela’s vast oil reserves.
President Donald Trump stated that the U.S. oil companies should return to Venezuela, signaling economic motives behind Washington’s aggression.
Trump also issued direct threats against other Venezuelan officials, reinforcing perceptions that the raid was tied to resource control rather than democratic principles.
Critics argue this intervention reflects a broader pattern of U.S. interference in Venezuela’s internal affairs.
What’s next:
Interim President Rodríguez, known for her staunch anti‑imperialist stance, must organize elections within 30 days while leading national resistance against U.S. forces.
Global outrage continues to mount, while European leaders face criticism for their silence and inaction.
Go deeper:
U.S. Attack on Venezuela Draws Condemnation From Iran
Hossein Amiri - Mahboubeh Habibi
