Why it matters:
Trump’s pursuit of the prize, one of the world’s most prestigious honors, reflects his desire for international legitimacy and could influence his approach to ongoing conflicts like the war in Ukraine. However, strong resistance within the committee suggests deep skepticism about his suitability as a peacemaker.
The big picture:
The Nobel Peace Prize has long been entangled in global politics, but Trump’s very public campaign, including claims of mediating multiple conflicts and direct outreach to Norwegian leaders, reveals an unprecedented effort to sway the committee, which values discretion and often shuns overtly political figures.
Key points:
- Chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee Jørgen Watne Frydnes has previously criticized Trump for eroding free speech
- Trump has lobbied Norwegian officials, including Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg
- Trump cites his role in the Armenia-Azerbaijan and Ukraine deals as key qualifications
Between the lines:
The U.S. president had promised Ukrainian President Zelensky to make peace in his country instead of 50 percent of Ukraine's mines.
The bottom line:
Trump’s fixation on the Nobel, spanning both his presidency and post-term life, underscores his obsession with validation from global elites he often publicly scorns. Yet the committee’s resistance signals a broader tension: can a figure who polarizes at home and abroad be reconciled with the prize’s ideals of unity and peace?
Go deeper:
Trump Demands $1 Billion Fine Against University of California
M.Majdi - seyed mohammad kazemi
